Web Applications

We start by reading what you have and mapping the parts that are load-bearing. Most engagements are incremental: a new rendering or routing approach applied route by route, with old and new paths running side by side. A rewrite is a recommendation of last resort, and if we make it we will show you the specific constraints that forced it.

We work mainly with React and Next.js, and with plain TypeScript and web platform APIs where a framework would add more than it removes. If your team already runs Angular or Vue and maintains it well, we build in that stack rather than introducing a second one. The framework matters less than the boundaries between rendering, state and data access.

Built in from the start, it is largely absorbed by work you were doing anyway — choosing accessible primitives and correct semantics instead of inaccessible ones, at similar effort. Retrofitting is where the cost appears, because it reaches into markup, focus management and sometimes the design itself. That is the argument for deciding it at the beginning.

Usually, but it constrains choices: what renders on the server, how many third-party scripts are allowed, how images and fonts are loaded. The budget is a design input, not an outcome. We agree the numbers before the build and enforce them in CI, and when a feature cannot fit inside them we say so rather than quietly raising the limit.

You do. Work lands in your repository, under your accounts and your cloud tenancy, from the first week rather than at handover. Handover itself is a scheduled activity: documentation, a walkthrough of the pipeline, and a period where your engineers lead and we review.

Yes, through our managed services and support models, with an agreed scope for monitoring, dependency updates and incident response. It is a separate agreement from the build, so you can also choose to run it yourself. Either way we design the observability and runbooks assuming someone other than the original authors will be on call.